Dominance and Suppression

•20080505 • Leave a Comment

An element of control is dominance. Dominance is an important part of control as it provides authority through imposition. Without dominance, control would remain too sparatic and more greatly resisted by the greater population.

There are various methods of imposition, each designed to occupy mind, thoughts and concentration through particular life activities, which themselves are designed toward overall mental submission and ignorance. Trapped in mental slavery ideas can remain lost in the limited perspectives of materialism, desire and greed futher filtering futher ideas, perspectives and other mental concepts portraying the message bottle lost in the sea of social consciousness.

These various impositions present themselves as a sea of duality, each designed to force the mind into taking a false choice to distract and and futher control the potentiality of perspective and state of mind. This is nothing less then mental conditioning by authoritative ideology and exists for nothing less then the mental slavery of societies.

The directing of societies does not require every individual to agree on a particular concept, as that in itself is impossible through natural mental diversity but the significant majority guided in unison by mutual agreement into illusion is a strong enough force of concentration and intention to steer society into predictable fields of reaction regardless of the resistance acted by the remaining minority.

This mutual agreement into illusion was only possible because those involved in the majority of social consciousness demanded this reality inadvertently through their desire, greed, fear and ignorance. Every decision made, designed to appear as achievement, success, reward or progress, perpetually acted as nothing more then a resistance of imagination which is the key to the doorways of true understanding. This illusion is nothing more then submission wrapped in the silhouette of reward or consequence.

Like a pet performing tricks, society has been chasing the bread crums for so long it has become a natural response unto obedience. The mental state of society acts as wave of intention which itself swamps any stray individual that falls into its path. Regardless of mental orientated, the effect is inevitable, the degree of manipulation just dependant on how deep the individuals subconscious will accept the many faucets of change and submission.

Even the greatest dillusioned of minds will resist sudden change of significant scale so it always important to develop these changes over a period of time. The best methods appears to be the subdivision of this idea of change into somewhat smaller sub-ideas which themselves seem insignificant enough to be acceptable or the least tolerable but in the long run just serve to encourage, develop and enforce the greater idea regardless.

Before society realises the severity of the storm the flooding and destruction has already taken hold. It creeps up on them all and before they can responed they find themselves chained to the seafloor with the waters rapidly rising. They literallity built their own prison wall around themselves before they realised they had been walking in circles the whole time and haven’t really achieved anything other then self-sacrifice despite the hypnotic aroma of reward becoming from blind-obedience.

*** TAGS/LINKS PENDING ***

Control

•20080504 • Leave a Comment

Monday 23rd May 2005 (Extracted TreeDBNotes Article)

By, I mean in respect to people and our environment. Nowadays it seems almost impossible to escape; arising from all ranges of authorities and organizations which believe they are their solely to help the greater community of New Zealand at least by my perspective …

… and this is how my perspective of control has spawned my beliefs and philosophies based around this subject of human control.

Control by most perceptions is the means of bringing a sense of order to some relative means of chaos. What I have found interesting and at times amusing is to learn different and conflicting ideas about this ‘chaos’, how to control it if need be and whether it actually exists in the first place. Control by my perception is the opposite end of Chaos and neither one truly exists without the presence of the other.

What I am getting at here is the middle ground; the true place whether Control and Chaos meet and where its relevance is most important; the true Order we should all be seeking. Total Control, and Total Chaos should not exist by any means in absolute without influence by the other. Let me explain this in another way;

Control in the most sense; especially in our lives can be attributed to improving our lifestyle by any means ranging from financial to just plain health and safety. Laws, are controls; designed by organizations and authorities to overcome relevant means of chaos which at times seem to exist only to challenge any attempts of control. This in my perception is an element of rebellion, which is an attempt to breach this control and challenge its true authority and relevance.

Control in a sense is a form of restriction; more or less a rule about what situations require which actions and which actions incur such consequences. In the most regards, these forms of control are their to aid us by some means and in most sense seem to achieve this; though with some element of sacrifice. The sacrifice is the idea of the control and the true reason for its existence. If there was no true sacrifice in relation to the chaos, then how can there be any element of control to begin with?; the control would drive onwards undeterred.

Therefore by thinking in that sense, Control is a sacrifice on our actions and therefore our lifestyle which reflects onwards to our total freedom and its relevance without our environment. What is even more important then the control, or the chaos which spawned it is to identify the relevance of these controls and how it should exist within regards to our freedom.

Freedom is a by-product of both control and chaos and so therefore can exist only beyond the means of them both. Freedom by my interpretation is the ability to make decisions and influence changes within our lifestyle to better suit our preferences and beliefs. The ability to make this change is brought around by the element of control we have on our environment to incur this change and to therefore improve our lifestyle. The ability to recognize this need for control and enforce it is the element of chaos which exists in all of us as the force behind our drive to have total freedom. If such things weren’t true; why would you not just adapt yourself to your environment without the need to enforce such a change? It isn’t because it is a sacrifice on your lifestyle and therefore your search for freedom is it? A catch-22 I know; but just as equally important to consider when trying to understand the need for control.

The laws that exist around us; even to this very day is a by-product of our drive for freedom; which by many people and their perceptions on life has brought them around to enforce certain means of control to maintain and improve it. These elements of control pass on to all those relevant to it and exist usually to support the greater majority of. Though, everyone is different, and no one truly sees the result of this control by the same perception as any other. Its presence and effectiveness is relative to any one single person and can change considerably in respect to how someone perceives it.

Some will see it as an improvement on lifestyle, others as a restriction or penalty on life… some will enforce it; others will attempt to rebel it. Its an unfortunate circle of chaos in itself, an amusing irony in any attempts to control it. Too much control can actually hinder any attempts at freedom.

Chaos in its raw sense brings about total disorder and therefore anything goes. Without some form of control life would become too erratic and difficult to adapt to. Though without Chaos, we couldn’t drive ourselves to rebel and fight the chaos and develop some form of order and control to overcome it; and in the further truth; fight the control to develop some form of additional freedom.

Control and Chaos are relative to each other and any other form related to it. Think of Control as “Chaos which brings about Control to overcome some other form of Chaos or Control” which is appearing to restrict its ability to develop a means of useful Chaos (which itself is designed to enforce the Control). Yeah, look at you now… your starting to look confused :)

*** TAGS/LINKS PENDING ***

Self-Defense

•20080504 • Leave a Comment

Monday 23rd May 2005 (Extracted TreeDBNotes Article)

The method of protecting the interests of life of yourself and/or others immediately around you from human intentions or otherwise unexpected or natural disasters.

In terms of the human aspect, it has come to my intention that a sense of limit seems imposed upon everyone about exactly how far anyone can go to protect themselves; in both socially acceptable and legal standards.

If your life was in danger; or someone you dearly cared about; how far would you go to protect yourself or them? In today’s society, the sacrifice of your own life to protect others around you is considered and honorable thing by most standards and is in most cases greatly respected; but … the method of killing another to protect even yourself; nowadays; seems to be quite a paradox; almost in all cases leading one to be  punished for the “crime”, going to jail for manslaughter or potentially murder just for the “excessive force” used in self-defense.

With that in thought; how justified is the law to punish the victim for the crime of saving their own life? Has society got to a point that with today’s beliefs a person cannot save themselves by taking a life of someone who in return has already decided to take theirs? The decision was not made by them, but was forced upon them and now they are in a desperate situation of trying to protect themselves.

The law has seemed to have grown to the point where it no longer serves the public; but seems to wish to control it; but that is itself another means of philosophy to debate about some other time.

*** TAGS/LINKS PENDING ***